Limbs, Shoulders, Necks, and Trunks: An Investigation of the Neck-Trunk Boundary in Squamates
Introduction
At least 30 squamate lineages have convergently evolved the elongate, limbless body plan most well known in snakes1, This makes squamates a useful group in which to study the factors that drive and constrain evolution. Though many aspects of the evolution of limblessness have been well studied, and compared between groups, body elongation, a defining part of this transition, is poorly understood.
The presacral region becomes elongate in all limbless and limb-reduced squamates, but it is unclear whether the neck region or the trunk region (torso) or both contribute to elongation. In other words, do limbless squamates have long necks or long trunks, or are both long? Furthermore, is elongation a similar process in all limbless groups?
Problem
One obstacle to studying body region evolution in limbless squamates is the difficulty of defining body regions.
In squamates, the boundary between the neck and the trunk region is usually defined as the last vertebra with a rib connecting to the sternum. In limbless squamates however, there is usually no sternum left!
Proposed Solutions
How can one define the neck-trunk boundary in groups that lack a rib connecting to the sternum? Here are three proposed morphological markers.
1. The presence of hypapophyses. These projections (marked in yellow) on the ventral sides of anterior vertebrae are found on the neck vertebrae of pentadactyl lizards and could distinguish the neck.
2. The position of whats left of the pectoral girdle (shoulder blades, collar bones, sternum). This would indicate where the forelimbs would be if they were to develop and where the trunk region could begin. Here, it is marked in orange at V6.
3. A shift in overall vertebral morphology. Neck vertebrae are shaped differently than trunk vertebrae. The difference in vertebral shapes could represent the boundary between the neck and trunk.
Method
CT data of lizards were downloaded from Morphosource.org and segmented in VGStudio or 3D Slicer. One lizard was used per species.
The hypapophyses were counted and the position of pectoral girdle elements (if they existed) were noted.
Shape Analysis
To assess overall vertebral morphology I used a geometric morphometric analysis (GMM). This is a statistical method used to calculate the similarity between complex shapes. Homologous points shared by all a specimen’s vertebrae were marked by landmark points. The positions of these points together represent the overall shape of the vertebra.
The shapes were then compared using a geometric
morphometric analysis. All the landmark data from a given specimen were compared and a Principle Component Analysis (PCA) was conducted.
Results
Discussion
Neck lengths vary between species and markers. All three markers are generally loosely associated with each other but seldom co-occur. However, in some species, the hypapophyses extend well past the other markers.
Clades show similar patterns
Related species show similar patterns suggesting phylogenetic history influences elongation. For example, the PCA plots for Gymnophthalmids show a gradual shift from neck to trunk morphology (top) rather than the typical sharp angle (bottom).
Necks tend to get shorter as bodies become longer
No specimen had a pectoral girdle past V9, and only a few limbless skinks had a GMM boundary posterior to the plesiomorphic position. This suggests a trend towards a decrease in neck length and that presacral elongation occurs only in the trunk for those metrics.
Variation leads to questions about body patterning
The neck-trunk boundary is thought to be patterned in development by the anterior extent of expression of the HoxC6 gene. However, this explanation is insufficient to account for species like Agamodon anguliceps, with possible boundaries at V3, V6, and V14. Which of these markers, if any does HoxC6 pattern? In Pantherophis guttatus, HoxC6’s anterior extent is V114, but none of the markers in this study occur there.
Given the variation in these data, there not be a true neck-trunk boundary. Though this makes body region determination difficult, it may be the key to revealing nuances in vertebrate body patterning.
Citations
1. Camaiti M., et al. (2022) A database of the morphology, ecology and literature of the world’s limb-reduced skinks.
2. Head, J., Polly, P. (2015) Evolution of the snake body form reveals homoplasy in amniote Hox gene function.
3. Zheng, Yuchi, and John J. Wiens. (2016) Combining phylogenomic and supermatrix approaches, and a time-calibrated phylogeny for squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes) based on 52 genes and 4162 species.
4. Woltering, Joost M., et al. (2009) Axial patterning in snakes and caecilians: evidence for an alternative interpretation of the Hox code.
Acknowledgements
Thank you to my husband Patrick, my family, and everyone who put their data on Morphosource.
Comments